Development of M3 as Improved Functionality Composite Excipient for Direct Compression
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2022.15.5.2Abstract
Introduction: Direct compression is the most preferred method of formulations of a compressed solid dosage form, but the poor compressibility of most of the active pharmaceutical ingredients limits the use of the direct compression technique.
Methodology: The present research study involves the development of M3 with improved functionality composite excipient used for direct compression. The aqueous dispersion of Maltose and Mannitol was co-processed with Maize Starch by using the co-drying technique. The dried composite was assessed for excipient functionalities such as Flowability, Compressibility, Mechanical Strength, Dilution Potential and Lubricant Sensitivity.
Results: The results of the study showed that composite excipient prepared by co-drying of maltose and mannitol with Maize Starch provides desired flowability, good compressibility and better mechanical strength. The study also revealed that the developed composite excipient exhibited better dilution potential and almost remain unaffected by the addition of a hydrophobic lubricating agent.
Conclusion: The developed excipient composite M3, can be used as directly compressible filler binder for a compressed solid dosage form containing poorly compressible active pharmaceutical ingredients.
Downloads
Metrics
Keywords:
Co-drying, Dilution Potential, Lubricant Sensitivity, Coprocessing, Direct Compression, Excipient functionality
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Bashir K, Aggarwal M. 2019; Physicochemical, structural and functional properties of native and irradiated starch: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 56(2):513-23.
Bin LK, Gaurav A, Mandal UK. 2019; A review on co-processed excipients: current and future trend of excipient technology. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 11(1): 9 Pages.
Builders PF, Anwunobi PA, Mbah CC, Adikwu MU. 2013; New direct compression excipient from tigernut starch: physicochemical and functional properties. AAPS Pharm Scitech. 14(2):818-27.
Ruegger CE, Metin C. 2000. The Effect of Compression and Decompression Speed on the Mechanical Strength of Compacts. Pharm Dev Technol. 5(4):485–94.
Daraghmeh N, Rashid I, Al Omari MM, Leharne SA, Chowdhry BZ, Badwan A. 2010; Preparation and characterization of a novel co-processed excipient of chitin and crystalline mannitol. AAPS Pharmscitech. 11(4):1558-71.
Dilebo J, Gabriel T. 2019; An overview of factors affecting super disintegrants functionalities. IJPSN. 12(1):4355-61.
Eckert M, Peciar P, Krok A, Fekete R. 2015; Application of Compaction Equations for Powdered Pharmaceutical Materials. Scientific Proceedings Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. 23(1):6-11.
Olorunsola EO, Akpan GA, Adikwu MU. 2017; Evaluation of Chitosan-Microcrystalline Cellulose Blends as Direct Compression Excipients. J Drug Deliv. Article ID 8563858, 8 pages.
Fuentes-González KI, Villafuerte-Robles L. 2014; Powder flowability as a functionality parameter of the excipient GalenIQ 720. Int. J Pharm Sci. 66-74.
Gohel MC, Patel TM, Parikh RK, Parejiya PB, Barot BS, Ramkishan A. 2012; Exploration of novel co-processed multifunctional diluent for the development of tablet dosage form. Ind J Pharm Sci. 74(5):381-6.
Gonnissen Y, Verhoeven E, Peeters E, Remon JP, Vervaet C. 2008; Coprocessing via spray drying as a formulation platform to improve the compactability of various drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 69(1):320-34.
Gupta P, Nachaegari SK, Bansal AK. 2006; Improved Excipient Functionality by Coprocessing In Katdare A, Chaubal MV, editor. Excipient Development for Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and Drug Delivery Systems. New York (NY): Informa Healthcare; p.109-126.
Hadkar UB. 2008; Practical Physical Pharmacy & Physical Pharmaceutics. Pragati Books Pvt. Ltd.; Aug 7.
Haruna F, Apeji YE, Oparaeche C, Oyi AR, Gamlen M. 2020; Compaction and tableting properties of composite particles of micro-crystalline cellulose and crospovidone engineered for direct compression. Future J Pharm Sci. 6(1) :1-9.
Hasan MM, Chowdhury SS, Lina SM, Bhoumik NC, Ashab I. 2012; Comparative evaluation of Zea mays (L.) and Ipomoea batatas (L.) as a pharmaceutical excipient. IOSR-JPBS. 3:31-6.
Hiestand EN. 1997; Principles, tenets and notions of tablet bonding and measurements of strength. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 44(3):229-42.
India. Department of Indian Systems of Medicine and Homoeopathy. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2014 Volume No. 1, Gaziabad. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC).
Jain G, Khar RK, Ahmad FJ. 2013; Theory and Practice of Physical Pharmacy. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Kar M, Chourasiya Y, Maheshwari R, Tekade RK. 2019; Current Developments in Excipient Science: Implication of Quantitative Selection of Each Excipient in Product Development. In Tekade RK, Editor. Basic Fundamentals of Drug Delivery. Academic Press; p.29-83.
Kim H, Venkatesh G, Fassihi R. 1998; Compactibility characterization of granular pectin for tableting operation using a compaction simulator. Int J Pharm. 161(2):149-59.
Klevan I. 2011; Compression analysis of pharmaceutical powders: assessment of mechanical properties and tablet manufacturability prediction. (Thesis) UiT Arctic University of Norway.
Kolter K, Guth F. 2017; Development of new excipients. In Koo OMY, editor. Pharmaceutical Excipients: Properties, Functionality, and Applications in Research and Industry. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; p.269-302.
Late SG, Banga AK. 2010; Response surface methodology to optimize novel fast disintegrating tablets using β cyclodextrin as diluent. AAPS Pharmscitech. 11(4):1627-35.
Mohanta GP, Manna PK. 2019; Physical Pharmacy Practical Text. 3rd Ed. Pharmamed Press; Hyderabad.
Morin G, Briens L. 2013; The effect of lubricants on powder flowability for pharmaceutical application. AAPS Pharmscitech. 14(3):1158-68.
Odeku OA, Schmid W, Picker-Freyer KM. 2008. Material and tablet properties of pregelatinized (thermally modified) Dioscorea starches. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 70(1):357-71.
Ohrem HL, Schornick E, Kalivoda A, Ognibene R. 2014; Why is mannitol becoming more and more popular as a pharmaceutical excipient in solid dosage forms? Pharm Dev Technol. 19(3):257-62.
Ohwoavworhua FO, Adeola JI, Kunle OO. 2005; Extraction and characterization of Vaondezia subterranean (L) (earth pea) starch a potential pharmacuetical excipient. JOPAT. 6-12.
Olorunsola EO, Akpan GA, Adikwu MU. 2017; Evaluation of chitosan-microcrystalline cellulose blends as direct compression excipients. J Drug deliv.
Olowosulu AK, Oyi A, Isah AB, Ibrahim MA. 2011; Formulation and evaluation of novel coprocessed excipients of maize starch and acacia gum (StarAc) for direct compression tabletting. IJPRI. 2:39-45.
Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK. 2006; Compression physics in the formulation development of tablets. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 23(1):1-65.
Patel SS, Patel NM. 2009; Development of directly compressible co-processed excipient for dispersible tablets using 32 full factorial design. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 1(1):125-48.
Penkina A, Antikainen O, Hakola M, Vuorinen S, Repo T, Yliruusi J, Veski P, Kogermann K, Heinämäki J. 2013; Direct compression of cellulose and lignin isolated by a new catalytic treatment. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 14(3):1129-36.
Saha S, Shahiwala AF. 2009; Multifunctional coprocessed excipients for improved tabletting performance. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 6(2):197-208.
Sandhan SB, Derle DV. 2019; A review on functionality assessment of multifunctional excipients IJPSR, 10(9): 4078-89.
Mizumoto T, YMasud Y, Yamamoto T, Yonemochi E, Terada K. 2005; Formulation design of a novel fast-disintegrating tablet. Int J Pharm. 306:83–90.
Tye CK, Sun CC, Amidon GE. 2005; Evaluation of the effects of tableting speed on the relationships between compaction pressure, tablet tensile strength, and tablet solid fraction. J Pharm Sci. 94(3):465-72.
Vanhoorne V, Peeters E, Van Snick B, Remon JP, Vervaet C. 2014; Crystal coating via spray drying to improve powder tabletability. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 88(3):939-44.
