Formulation and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Tablet: Influence of Some Hydrophilic Polymers on the Release Rate and In Vitro Evaluation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2010.3.3.9

Authors

  • S K Singh
  • S B Bothara
  • S Singh
  • R Patel
  • R Dodia

Abstract

 Extending the residence time of a dosage form at a particular site and controlling the release of drug from the dosage form are useful especially for achieving controlled plasma level of the drug as well as improving bioavailability. The objective of this study was to extend the GI residence time of the dosage form and control the release of Tramadol HCl using mucoadhesive tablet to achieve controlled plasma level of the drug which is especially useful for 12 hrs. Matrix tablets of Tramadol HCl were formulated using different mucoadhesive polymers namely guar gum, xanthan gum and Methocel (HPMC K15M and HPMC K100M). Formulations were evaluated for preformulation parameters, in vitro drug release profile and release kinetics. The formulations were found to have good preformulation characteristics. FTIR spectroscopy indicated the absence of any significant chemical interaction within dug and excipients. The release mechanism of Tramadol HCl from matrix tablets indicated anomalous (non-Fickian) transport mechanism and followed zero order kinetics. The retention time of the mucoadhesive tablet on the mucous membrane were investigated to develop a bioadhesive polymer-based controlled release delivery system and to evaluate the performance of such a delivery devices. The combination of HPMC K15: HPMC K100: Xanthan gum (1:2:1) and HPMC K 100: Xanthan gum (2:2) showed a greater bioadhesive strength as compared to single gum and other hydrophilic polymer combination tablet. The stability studies were performed on optimized formulation as per ICH guideline, result showed that there was no significant change in physical characteristic, adhesive strength and In vitro release.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2010-11-30

How to Cite

1.
Singh SK, Bothara SB, Singh S, Patel R, Dodia R. Formulation and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Tablet: Influence of Some Hydrophilic Polymers on the Release Rate and In Vitro Evaluation. Scopus Indexed [Internet]. 2010 Nov. 30 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];3(3):1111-2. Available from: https://ijpsnonline.com/index.php/ijpsn/article/view/524

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Achar L, Pepass N, Preparation, characterization and mucoadhesive interaction of poly (methacrylic acid) copolymer with rate mucosa. J.control Release. ; 1994; 31, 271-276.

Akiyama Y, Nagahara N, In: Bioadhesive Drug Delivery Systems, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 477-505 (1999).

Baumgartner S, Kristel J, Vreer F, Vodopivec P, Zorko B, Optimization of floating matrix tablets and evaluation of their gastric residence time, Int. J. Pharm.; 2000; 195(1-2), 125-135.

Beckett AH, Stenlake JK, Practical Pharmaceutical chemistry: Part 2, CBS Publication, New Delhi, 383-389 (2004).

Bhupinder Singh, Naveen Ahuja, Development of controlled release buccoadhesive hydrophilic matrices of diltiazem hydrochloride, optimization of bioadhesion, dissolution and diffusion parameter, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy; 2002; Vol. 28(4), 431-442.

Bhupinder Singh, Sukhwinder Kaur Chakkal, Naveen Ahuja, Formulation and Optimization of Controlled Release Mucoadhesive Tablets of Atenolol Using Response Surface Methodology, AAPS PharmSciTech; 2006; 7 (1) Article 3.

Elizabeth B Vadas, Gennaro, AR, Eds., Reimington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy; 20thEdition; Vol. I, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, PA, 986-987 (2000).

Gilbert S, Banker, Neil R, Anderson, Lachman L, Liberman HA, The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy: 3rdedition, Mumbai: varghese publishing House, 88, 299 (1990).

Gupta PK, Leung SHS, Robinson JR, Bioadhesive Drug Delivery Systems: CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 65-92 (1990)

ICH Harmonized Tripartite guideline, validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology Q2 (R1), ICH steering committee, 2005.

ICH Q1A (R2), Stability Testing Guidelines, Stability testing of a new drug product and new drug substance (2005).

Indian Pharmacopia, Vol. II, Controller of Publication, Delhi, (1996). A-82-83.

Jay S, Fountain W, Cui Z, Mumper RJ, Transmucosal delivery of testosterone in rabbits using novel bi-layer mucoadhesive wax-film composite disks. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2002; 91(9): 2016-25.

Jimenez CNR, Zia H, Rhodes CT, Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Phar.; 1993; 19: 143-94.

Juan Manuel Llabot, Ruben Hilario Manzo Daniel Alberto Allemandi, Double-Layered Mucoadhesive Tablets Containing Nystatin, AAPS PharmSciTech; 2002; 3 (3) article 22.

Kashappa Goud H Desai, Pramod Kumar TM, Preparation and Evaluation of a Novel Buccal Adhesive System, AAPS PharmSciTech; 2004; 5 (3) Article 35.

Kulkarni G T, Gowathamarajan K, Suresh B, Stability testing of Pharmaceutical product: an overview, Ind. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2004; 38(4), 194-202.

Lalla JK, Gurnancy RA, Polymers for mucosal delivery-Swelling and mucoadhesive evaluation, Indian Drug; 2002; 39 (5), 270-276.

Louis S, Drug facts and comparisons: 50th Edition, A Walter kluwar company, 1301-1303 (1996).

Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD, A rheological examination of mucoadhesive/mucus interaction: The effect of mucoadhesive type and concentration. J. Contr. Rel.; 1998; 50: 167-78.

Mahesh D. Chavanpatil, Paras Jain, Sachin Chaudhari, Rajesh Shear, Pradeep R. Vavia, Novel sustained release, swellable and bioadhesive gastroretentive drug delivery system for ofloxacin, International Journal of Pharmaceutics; 2006; 316, 86–92.

Noha Adel naffee, Fatma Ahmed ismail, Nabila Ahmed Boraje, Mucoadhesive delivery systems. II formulation and invitro / invivo evaluationof Buccal Mucoadhesive tablets containing water soluble drugs, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy; 2004; Vol. 30 (9): 995-1004.

Owens TS, Dansereau RJ, Adel Sakr, Development and evaluation of extended release bioadhesive sodium fluoride tablets, International Journal of Pharmaceutics; 2005; 288, 109–122.

Ranga Rao KV, Buri PA, Novel in situ method to test polymers and coated micro particles for bioadhesion. Int. J. Pharm.; 1989; 52, 256-270.

Sanford Bolton, Pharmaceutical Statistics; 3rd Edition, Marcel Dekker, 216-263 (1997).

Sean C, Sweatman, Martindale, The complete drug Reference: 32rd Edition, American Pharmaceutical press, 90-91 (2002)

Sharma, YR, Element organic Spectroscopy: 4th edition, S. Chand Publication, New Delhi, 132-133 (2009).

Tayed PT, Vavia PR, Inclusion complexes of ketoprofen with β-cyclodextrin: oral pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen in human. Indian J. Pharm. Sciences; 2005; 408-412.

United States Pharmacopeia, XXVI NF 26, United State Pharmacopeia Convention, Asian edition, Rockville, (2008), Voll- I, 368.

Willard, Meritt, Dean, Settle, Instrumental method of analysis: 7th Edition, CBS Publication New Delhi, 201-209 (1988).