Development of Promethazine Hydrochloride Mucoadhesive Patches for Buccal Delivery: In vitro, Ex vivo and In vivo Characterization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2012.5.2.5Abstract
Promethazine hydrochloride (PMZ HCl), an antiemetic, undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism (bioavailability 25%). The purpose of the present investigation was to develop mucoadhesive patches for transbuccal delivery of PMZ HCl using solvent casting technique with Hydroxy ethyl cellulose (Natrosol 250 E) and hydroxylpropyl methyl cellulose as mucoadhesive polymers and propylene glycol as the plasticizer and evaluate their physicochemical characteristics, in vitro drug release, moisture absorption, surface pH, mechanical properties, in vitro bioadhesion, in vivo residence time, and ex vivo drug permeation through porcine buccal membranes from optimized buccal patch and stability studies. The physicochemical interaction between PMZ HCl and polymers was investigated by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Ex vivo drug permeation through porcine buccal membrane was performed and 83.7% of the drug permeated in 6 hours with flux 0.19 mg h–1cm–2. The optimized formulation AA4 showed maximum drug release (98%) in 6 hours in the Higuchi model release profile. Moisture absorption, surface pH, tensile strength, elongation at break, peak detachment force and work of adhesion values of the optimized formulation were found to be 68.1%, pH 6.7, 12.3 kg/mm2, 69.2 % mm2, 7.5 N and 2.73 mJ respectively. Formulation AA4 showed 77.6% of the drug permeated through porcine buccal membrane in 6 hours and flux calculated to be 0.45 mg h–1cm–2. FTIR studies showed no evidence of interaction between the drug and polymers. In vivo mucoadhesive behaviour of the optimized formulation was studied in healthy human volunteers and subjective parameters were evaluated. The stability of the optimized formulation was studied and no significant changes were detected in drug content, in vitro release and ex vivo permeation after 6 months.
Downloads
Metrics
Keywords:
Promethazine hydrochloride, buccal patches, bioadhesion, ex vivo permeation, in vivo residence timeDownloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Anders R and Merkle HP (1989). Evaluation of laminated mucoadhesive patches for buccal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 49:231-240.
Aulton ME, Abdul-Razzak MH, and Hogan JE (1981). The mechanical properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films derived from aqueous systems: the influence of solid inclusions. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 7:649-668.
Bottenberg P, Cleymaet R, Muynek CD, Remon JP, Coomans D, and Slop D (1991). Development and testing of bioadhesive, fluoride containing slow release tablets for oral use. J Pharm Pharmacol 43:457-464.
Chen WG and Hwang G (1992). Adhesive and in vitro release characteristics of propranolol bioadhesive disc system. Int J Pharm 82:61-66.
Chinna Reddy P, Ramesh G, Shravan Kumar Y, Vamshi Vishnu Y, and Madhusudan Rao Y (2011). Development of bioadhesive buccal tablets for felodipine and pioglitazone in combined dosage form: In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo characterization. Drug Del 18(5):344-352.
Chinna Reddy P, Ramesh G, Vamshi Vishnu Y, Shravan Kumar Y, and Madhusudan Rao Y (2010). Development of bilayered mucoadhesive patches for buccal delivery of felodipine: in vitro and ex vivo characterization. Curr Trends Biotech Pharm 4:673-683.
Dortunc B, Ozer L, and Uyanik N (1998). Development and in vitro evaluation of a buccoadhesive pindolol tablet formulation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 24:281-288.
Duchene DE, Touchard F, and Peppas NA (1988). Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of bioadhesive systems for drug administration. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 14:283-318.
Gu JM, Robinson JR, and Leung SHS (1988). Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure-property relationships. Crit. Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 5:21-67.
Guo JH (1994). Bioadhesive polymer buccal patches for buprenorphine controlled delivery: formulation in vitro adhesion and release properties. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 20:2809-2821.
Harris D and Robinson JR (1992). Drug delivery via the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. J Pharm Sci 81(1):1-10.
Ishida M, Nambu N, and Nagai T (1983). Highly viscous gel ointment containing Carbopol for application to the oral mucosa. Chem Pharm Bull 31:4561-4564.
Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, and Peppas NA(1983). Mechanism of solute release from porous hydro-matrices and other factors may be responsible. Int J Pharm 15:25-35.
Nagai T and Konishi R (1987). Buccal/gingival drug delivery systems. J Contr Rel 6:353-360.
Peh KK and Wong CF (1999). Polymeric films as vehicle for buccal delivery: swelling, mechanical, and bioadhesive properties. J Pharm Sci 2:53-61.
Peppas NA (1985). Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug matrix tablets with respect to the compression force release from polymers. Pharm Acta Helv 60:110-111.
Remunan-Lopez C, Portero A, Vila-Jato JL, and Alonso MJ (1998). Design and evaluation of chitosan/ ethyl cellulose mucoadhesive bilayered devices for buccal drug delivery. J Contr Rel 55:143-152.
Schwinghammer TL, Juhl RO, and Dittert LW (1984). Comparison of the bioavailability of oral, rectal and intramuscular promethazine. Biopharm. Drug Disp 5:185-194.
Squier CA, Cox P and Wertz PW (1991). Lipid content and water permeability of skin and oral mucosa. J Invest Dermat 96:123-126.
Van Eyk DA and Vander BP (2004). Comparative permeability of various chemical markers through human vaginal and buccal mucosa as well as porcine buccal and mouth floor mucosa. Arch Oral Biol 49:387-396.
Windholz M, Budavari S, Blumetti RF, and Otterbein ES (1983). Merck Index -An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs and biologicals. Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ, pp.1463-1468.
Wong CF, Yuen KH, and Peh K (1999). An in vitro method for buccal adhesion studies: Importance of instrument variables. Int J Pharm 180:47-57.