Ocular Drug Delivery Systems for Treatment of Glaucoma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2014.7.2.2

Authors

  • Akhilesh Dubey
  • Prabhu Prabhakara

Abstract

Glaucoma is a common eye disease that can cause irreversible blindness if left undiagnosed and untreated. Glaucoma is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder of the eye. Glaucoma can be roughly divided into two main categories "open angle" and "closed angle" (or "angle closure") glaucoma. Every available treatment to prevent progressive glaucoma involves a certain amount of risk and financial expense. Conventional first-line treatment of glaucoma usually begins with the use of a topical selective or nonselective β-blockers or topical prostaglandin analogs. Second-line drugs of choice include α-agonists and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Parasympatho-mimetic agents, most commonly pilocarpine, are considered third-line treatment options. For patients who do not respond to antiglaucoma medications, laser trabeculoplasty and incisional surgery are further methods that can be used to lower intraocular pressure. Ocular drug delivery is hampered by the barriers protecting the eye. The bioavailability of the active drug substance is often the major hurdle to overcome. Conventional ocular dosage form, including eye drops, is no longer sufficient to combat ocular diseases. This article reviews the better understanding about glaucoma disease like prevention and diagnosis and explores various approaches like niosomes, liposomes, hydrogels, nanoparticles, nanosuspensions, microparticles, microemulsions, prodrugs and ocular inserts to improve the ocular bioavailability of drug and provide continuous and controlled release of the drug to the anterior and posterior chamber of the eye. In near future, a great deal of attention will be paid to develop a suitable and effective treatment for the vision threatening disorders like glaucoma. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Keywords:

Ocular drug delivery system, Glaucoma, Hydrogel, Niosomes, Liposomes, Ocular Inserts

Downloads

Published

2014-05-31

How to Cite

1.
Dubey A, Prabhakara P. Ocular Drug Delivery Systems for Treatment of Glaucoma. Scopus Indexed [Internet]. 2014 May 31 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];7(2):2412-2. Available from: https://ijpsnonline.com/index.php/ijpsn/article/view/708

Issue

Section

Review Articles

References

Aggarwal D and Kaur IP (2005). Improved pharmacodynamics of timolol maleate from a mucoadhesive niosomal ophthalmic drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 290: 155.

ArtoUrtti (2006). Challenges and obstacles of ocular pharma-cokinetics and drug delivery. Ad Drug DelRev 58: 1131-35.

Ah El Kamal (2002). In vitro and In vivo evaluation of pluronic F 127 based ocular delivery system based on the system for timolol maleate. Int J Pharm 241: 47-55.

Ansari MJ, Kohli K, Dixit N (2008). Microemulsions as potential drug delivery systems: A review. J Pharm Sci Technol 62: 66-79.

Agnihotri SA, Mallikarjuna NN, Aminabhavi TM (2004). Recent advances on chitosan based micro and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J Controll Rel 100:5-28.

Brad F (2008). Relative course of retinal nerve fiber layer birefringence and thickness and retinal function changes after optic nerve transection. Investigative Ophthalmol & Visual Sci 49:10.

Baudowin C (1996). Side effects of anti glaucomatous drugs on the ocular surface. Current Opthathalmol 7: 80-86.

Bloomfield SE, Mijata T, Dinn MW, Stenzel KH, Randle SS, and Rubin AL (1977). Soluble artificial tear inserts. Arch opthalmol 95:247-50.

Baudowin C, Hammard P, Liang H, Creuzot-Garcher C, Bensoussan L, Brignote F (2004). Conjuctival epithelial cell expression of interleukins and inflammatory markers in glaucoma patients treated over the long term. Opthalmol 111: 2186-92.

Bharath S (2009). Sustained ophthalmic delivery of ofloxacin from an ion activated in situ gelling system. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci 22: 2.

Broadway D, Grierson I, and Hitchings R (1993). Adverse effects of topical antiglaucomatous medications on the conjunctiva. Br J Opthalmol 77: 590-96.

Chen PP (2003). Blindness in patients with treated open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 110: 726-33.

Derek S (2012). Functional genomics screening identifies dual leucine zipper kinase as a key mediator of retinal ganglion cell death. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 4045-4050.

Douglas A (1995). Autoregulation of Human Optic Nerve Head Circulation in Response to Increased Intraocular Pressure. Investigative Ophthalmol & Visual Sci 36: 24-26.

Dhaliwal S, Jain S, Singh HP, and Tiwary AK (2008). Mucoadhesive microspheres for gastroretentive delivery of acyclovir: in- vitro and in vivo evaluation. AAPS 10: 322-30.

Durrani AM, and Davies NM (1992). Pilocarpine bioavailability from a mucoadhesive liposomal ophthalmic drug delivery system. Int J Pharm88: 409-415.

Evan D (1998). A Proposed Role for Excitotoxicity in Glaucoma. J Glaucoma 7: 62-67.

Ehlers N, Bramsen T, and Sperling S (1975). Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 53: 34-43.

Giaconi JA, Law SK, and Caprioli J (2009). Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma. 15th ed, Pa: LippincottWilliams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

Gurny R (1981). Preliminary study of prolonged acting drug delivery system for the treatment of glaucoma. Pharmactahelv. 56: 130-32.

Hitesh B.Gevariya and Jayvadan Patel (2012). A Review on recent trends in niosomal antiglaucoma drug delivery system. World J Pharm Res 1: 39-49.

Kuno N and Fujii S (2011). Recent advances in ocular drug delivery systems. Polymers 3:193-221.

Konstas AG, Mantziris DA, and Stewart WC (1997). Divenal intraocular pressure in untreated exfoliation and primary open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115: 182-5.

Kumarasamy NA, Lam FS, Wang AL, Theoharides TC (2006). Glaucoma: Current and developing concepts for inflammation, pathogenesis and treatment. Eur J Inflamm 4: 129-37.

Lambert Gand Guilatt RL (2005). Current ocular drug delivery challenges. Drug Dev Report Industry Overview Details 33: 1-2.

Livia Budai et al., (2007). Gels and Liposomes in optimized ocular drug delivery studies on ciprofloxacin formulations. Int J Pharm. 96(2): 421-27.

Leopold S (2012). Glaucoma: A systemic condition? Br J Opthalmol 96: 613.

Liu JH and Weinreb RN (2011). Monitoring intraocular pressure for 24 hr. Br J Ophthalmol 95:599-600.

Liu JH, Zhang X, Kripke DF, and Wienreb RN (2003). Twenty four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucou-mateous changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 1586-90.

Mietzh NU and Krieglstein GK (1994). The effect of preservatives and anti glaucomatous medication on the histopathology of the conjunctiva. Graefes Arch clin Expo ophthalmol 232: 561-65.

Maurice DM (1958). A Recording tonometer. Br J Opthalmol 42: 321-35.

Pergande G and Keipects S (1990). Antiglaucoma ophthalmic agents with prolonged action based on macromolecular exipients-1: in vitro studies. Pharmazie 45: 582-6.

Patel Vishal and Agrawal YK (2011). Current status and Advanced Approaches in ocular drug deliverysystem. J Global Trends Pharm Sci 2: 131-48.

Prabhu P, Marina Koland, Vijaynarayan K, Harish NM, Ganesh D,Charyulu RN, and Satyanarayan D (2008). Preparation and evaluation of niosomes of brimonidinetartarate as ocular drug delivery system. J Pharm Res Health care 2:293-301.

Quigley HA (1996). Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.Br J Ophthalmol 80: 89-93.

Rathore KS and Nema RK (2009). An Insight into ophthalmic drug delivery system. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res 1: 1-5.

Sharma J, Banik PK and Dixit SA (2011) New Trend: Ocular drug delivery Systems. An Int J Pharm Sci 3: 1-25

Saini Nand Kumar D (2012). An Insight to ophthalmic drug delivery system.Int J Pharm Studies Res 3: 9-13.

Sathyavathi V, Abdul Hasan Sathali A, Ilavarasan R, and Sangeetha T (2012). Formulation and evaluation ofniosomal Insitu gel ocular delivery system of brimonidinetartarate. Int J Life Sci Pharm Res2: 82-95.

Sabyasachi Maiti (2010). Antiglaucomatic niosomal system. Recent trend in ocular delivery research. IntJ Pharm Sci 2: 23-31.

Sommer A (2011). Ocular hypertension and normal tension glaucoma time for banishment and burial. Arch Ophthalmol 129: 785-7.

Sahoo SK, Dilnawaz F, and Krishnakumar S (2008). Nanotechnology in ocular drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 13: 144-51.

Saima A, Saeid R, and Kohli K (2009). Hydrogels as potential drug delivery systems. Scient. Res and Essay 3: 1175-83.

Soppimath KS, Aminabhavi TM, Kulkarni AR, Rudzinski WE (2001). Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices. J ControllRel 70: 1-20.

Thylefors B and Negrel AD (1994). The global impact of glaucoma. Bull world health organ 72: 323-26.

Tamizharasi S, Dubey A, Rathi V, and Rathi JC (2009). Development and characterization of niosomal drug delivery of gliclazide. J Young Pharm 1: 205-9.

Uchegbu IF and Vyas SP (1998). Non-Ionic Surfactant based vesicles (Niosomes) in drug delivery. Int JPharm172: 35-70.

Vandervoort J and Ludwig A (1999). Evaluation of pilocarpine loaded gelatin particles for topical ophthalmicuse. J Pharm Bellg. 54: 85-6.

Vinod S, Bushetti SS, Appala Raju SS, Rizwan Ahmed, Mamta Singh (2011). Glaucoma: A Treatment byhydrogel. AnInt J Pharm Sci. 1: 174-83.

Vasir JK, TamburkarK, and Garg S (2003). Bioadhesive microspheres as a controlled drug delivery. Int JPharm 255: 13-32.

Wierbowska J, Wierzbowski R, and Stankie A (2012). Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in patients with normal tension glaucoma: 24 hr heart rate and blood pressure variability analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 96: 624-28.

Whitacre M and Stein R (1993). Sources of error with goldman type tonometers. SurvOphthalmol 38: 1-30.