Formulation and Evaluation of Atenolol and Indapamide SR Matrix Tablets for Treatment of Hypertension

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2014.7.2.7

Authors

  • Sarika Pundir
  • Ashutosh Badola

Abstract

In the present study we have formulated (F1 to F6) matrix tablets of atenolol and indapamide for the management of hypertension. As in simultaneous estimation of these drugs it was found that a confined release can be formulated. In the formulation of SR matrix tablet by using different concentration of delayed release agent DCP and pregelatinized starch as disintegrant we prepared tablets by wet granulation method. For sustained release action HPMC polymers were used for film coating. Preformulation studies were performed prior to compression. The compressed SR matrix tablets were evaluated for weight variation, hardness, friability, drug content, disintegration time and in vitro drug release using USP dissolution apparatus type 2 (paddle). It was found that the optimized formulation showed 49.33%, 48.90%, 48.52%, 47.65%, 46.84% and 46.51% release for atenolol in 12 hours respectively. However, indapamide released 49.62%, 49.39%, 48.72%, 48.27%, 47.59% and 47.36% at the end of 12 hr. The IR spectrum study revealed that there is no disturbance in the principal peaks of pure drugs atenolol and indapamide. This confirms the integrity of pure drugs and no incompatibility of them with excipients. The stability studies were carried out for the optimized batch for one months and it showed satisfactory results. The kinetic studies of the formulations revealed that diffusion is the predominant mechanism of drug and release follows Zero-order, Super case II transport.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Keywords:

Matrix technology, Atenolol, Indapamide, Zero-order, Hypertension

Downloads

Published

2014-05-31

How to Cite

1.
Pundir S, Badola A. Formulation and Evaluation of Atenolol and Indapamide SR Matrix Tablets for Treatment of Hypertension. Scopus Indexed [Internet]. 2014 May 31 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];7(2):2450-8. Available from: https://ijpsnonline.com/index.php/ijpsn/article/view/713

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Ames RP (1996). A comparison of blood lipid and blood pressure responses during the treatment of systemic hypertension with indapamide and with thiazides. Am J Cardid 77: 12B-16B.

Banker & Rhodes CT (2008). Modern pharmaceutics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 239-261.

Banker GS and Anderson NR (1990). The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy: Tablet, Lachman, (3rd ed) Varghese Publishing House, Bombay, pp-171-195.

Brahmankar DM and Jaiswal SB (2009). Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics: Pharmacokinetics, (2nd ed) Vallabh Prakashan, Delhi, pp-399-401, 432.

Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al., (2002). Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomized trial against atenolol. Lancet 359: 995-1003.

Day JL, Metcalf J, Simpson CN (1982). Adrenergic mechanisms in control of plasma lipid concentrations. BMJ 284: 1145-8.

Gennaro AR (1990). Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy Vol.1, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 20th ed. pp-700-719.

John C and Morten C (2002). The Science of Dosage Form Design, Aulton: Modified release peroral dosage forms, (2nd ed) Churchill Livingstone. pp-290-300.

Kreeft JH, et al., (1984). Comparative trial of indapamide and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension with forearm plethysmography. Cardiovasc Pharmacol 6: 622-626.

Lee VHL (1982). Controlled Drug Delivery Fundamentals and Applications: Introduction, Marcel Dekker, (2nd ed), New York, pp-29-42.

Lu Y, et al., (1998). Effects of the diuretic agent indapamide on Na+, transient outward and delayed rectifier currents in canine atrial myocytes. Circ Res 83: 158-166.

MRC WP (1992). Medical research council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults. Principal results BMJ 304: 405-12.

Pires de Abreu LR, Calafatti de Castro SA, Pedrazzoli J (2003). Atenolol quantification in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography: Application to bioequivalence study. AAPS Pharm Sci 5: 21-25.

Podczeck F, Drake KR, Neton JM, and Harian I (2008). The strength of bi layered tablet. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 3: 1-14.

Sever P, Dahlof P, Poulter NR, et al., (2001). The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: a brief history, rational and outline protocol. J Human Hypertens 15(Suppl): S11-12.

Shargel L and Yu ABC (1993). Applied Biopharmaceutics and British Pharmacopoeia, London, 3rd Ed, Prentice Hall International, New Jersey pp-111-167.

Sinco Patrick J (2006). Martin’s physical pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences, fifth edition, Lippincott Williams & Wikkins, A Walters Kluwer, pp-428-429.