Formulation and Ex-vivo Evaluation of Glipizide Buccal Tablets

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2014.7.2.10

Authors

  • Sudarshan Singh
  • Sandip G Maru
  • Sunil Bothara B

Abstract

Bioadhesive materials are agents which adhere to the mucous membrane due to specific properties and release the drug at the site of action in controlled manner. Since the biodegradability of the synthetic polymer is at some instance hesitant. In this exploration, a bioadhesive polymer has been developed which was isolated from leaves of Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. The mucilage isolated from A. vera were used as a bioadhesive polymer in tablet formulation and evaluated for the parameters such as swelling, pH, and bioadhesive property like bioadhesive strength, record of adherence and ex-vivo residence time. The buccal bioadhesive tablet was prepared using glipizide as model drug. The prepared tablet was evaluated against existing bioadhesive polymer such as guar gum and hydroxyl propyl cellulose. Swelling index and surface pH was found to be 13.12-18.06% and 6.5-6.9 respectively. The drug permeation through goat buccal mucosa was found to be 60.21 ± 0.06 % in the end of 7 h with a Jss of 0.24 mg h-1 cm-2. The stability studies were performed on optimized formulation as per ICH guideline, result showed that there was no significant change in physical characteristic, adhesive strength and in vitro release. It was observed that as the concentration of mucilage increases swelling index also increases. Results of pH showed that mucilage is slightly near to neutral in nature. Formulations were evaluated for preformulation parameters, in vitro drug release profile and release kinetics. The formulations were found to have good preformulation characteristics. FTIR spectroscopy showed no significant chemical interaction within drug and excipients. The release mechanism of glipizide from buccal tablets indicated anomalous (non-fickian) transport mechanism and followed zero order kinetics. It was concluded that the mucilage of A. vera can be used as a pharmaceutical excipient in buccal bioadhesive drug delivery systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Keywords:

Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f, Natural Gum, Bioadhesive strength, Record of adherence.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-31

How to Cite

1.
Singh S, Maru SG, Bothara B S. Formulation and Ex-vivo Evaluation of Glipizide Buccal Tablets. Scopus Indexed [Internet]. 2014 May 31 [cited 2024 Sep. 8];7(2):2487-93. Available from: https://ijpsnonline.com/index.php/ijpsn/article/view/718

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Agaiah G (2011). Formulation and Evaluation of Bioadhesive Buccal Tablets of Simvastatin, J Adv Pharma Sci 214: 29-39.

Ahuja A, Khar RK, Ali J (1997). Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems, Drug Dev Ind Pharm 23(5): 489-517.

AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed, Washington DC (USA), Association of Official Analytical Chemist.

Asha S, John D (2010). Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive drug delivery system for Atorvastatin calcium, J Current Pharma Res 125: 31-38.

Aulton ME (2007). In: Pharmaceutics-The design and manufacture of medicines. London New York: Churchil Livingstone, pp 126.

Balatripura Sundari G and Chowdary KPR (2003). Design and evaluation of controlled release oral tablets of Glipizide, Ind J Pharm Sci 65(6): 591-594.

British Pharmacopoeia (2009). The Department of Health, London: The Stationary Office, pp. 137-138.

Gurpreet A and Malik K (2011). Formulation and Evaluation of Controlled Release Mucoadhesive Matrix Tablets: Assessment of Myrrh Oleo Gum Resin as a Natural Pharmaceutical Excipient, Int J Pharma Sci Drug Res 229: 84-88.

Hindustan AA and Suresh K (2010). Preparation and Evaluation of Sustained Release Matrix Tablets of Gliquidone based on combination of Natural and Synthetic, J Advanced Pharma. Res 96: 108-114.

Hindustan AA, Sreeramulu A and Himabindu V (2009). Fabrication and Comparative Evaluation of Glipizide Aloe barbadensis miller mucilage, Guar gum and Ispaghula husk based sustained Release matrix tablet, Int J Chem Sci 214: 479-90.

Indian Pharmacopoeia (2007). Govt. of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Ghaziabad: Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, pp 714.

Lee JW, Park JH, and Robinson JR (2000). Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: The next generation. J Pharm Sci 89: 850-866.

Madhusudan RY, Vani G and Bala RR (1999). Design and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems, Ind Drugs 245: 558-65.

Patidar D, Jain A and Jatav RK and Sharma H (2011). Formulation and Evaluation of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride Matrix Tablet Containing Aloe Barbadensis Miller Mucilage Natural Anti-diabetic Agent, Int J Drug Discovery and Herbal Res 279: 157-63.

Peh KK and Wong CF (1999). Polymeric Films as Vehicle for Buccal Drug Delivery: Swelling, Mechanical and Bioadhesive Properties,J Pharm Sci 354:53-61.

Raval A and Modi V (2011). Formulation and process optimization of buccoadhesive tablet of Rabeprazole, Int J Pharma Chem Sci 123: 41-49.

Semalty M, Semalty A, and Kumar G (2008). Formulation and Characterization of Mucoadhesive Films of Glipizide, Ind J Pharma Sci 70: 43-48.

Shoaib HM and Jaweria RI (2006). Evaluation of Drug Release Kinetics from Ibuprofen Matrix Tablets Using HPMC, J Pharma Sci 257: 119-124.

Singh S and Singh S (2010). Preliminary Investigation of Cassia Sophera Linn Seed Mucilage in Tablet Formulations. Int J Pharm Applied Sci 112: 62-68.

Yajaman S and Ketousetuo K (2010). Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery: A promising option for orally less efficient drugs, J Cont Release 169: 15-10.

Yash P, Kumar S, and Sehrawat R (2012). Design, Development and Characterization of Mucoadhesiv

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>