Advancement of Robotic in Surgery: Challenging Application in Healthcare Sector

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn‐aktu.2022‐13

Authors

  • Sakshi Sharma Noida Institute of Engineering & Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Knowledge Park-2, Greater Noida
  • Avijit Mazumder Noida Institute of Engineering & Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Knowledge Park-2, Greater Noida
  • Richa Shakya Noida Institute of Engineering & Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Knowledge Park-2, Greater Noida
  • Shalini Sharma Noida Institute of Engineering & Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Knowledge Park-2, Greater Noida

Abstract

Over last two decades’ robotic surgery is in greater demand, and it is putting an innovative step towards enlightening surgical intervention. Due to the wider ratification of robotics in surgery, it drives to give compact and more economical and help in pouring researchers to reach on a certain height. Several hospitals and health care centres are adopting this method successfully. The aim of this article is to provide an insight into the challenges of the recent methods used in robotic surgical technology. Moreover, we have also given a comparison and classification of surgical robotics methods, its application and deliberate their future directions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

Minimal invasive methods, Surgical system, Robotic Surgery, Traditional surgery, Advanced robotics surgery

Published

2023-09-15

How to Cite

1.
Sharma S, Mazumder A, Shakya R, Sharma S. Advancement of Robotic in Surgery: Challenging Application in Healthcare Sector. Scopus Indexed [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 15 [cited 2024 Dec. 30];15(7):6714-9. Available from: https://ijpsnonline.com/index.php/ijpsn/article/view/4823

References

Valero, R., Ko, Y. H., Chauhan, S., Schatloff, O., Sivaraman, A., Coelho, R. F., Ortega, F., Palmer, K. J., Sanchez-Salas, R., Davila, H., &Cathelineau, X. (2011). Robotic surgery: History and teaching impact. ActasUrológicasEspañolas (English Edition), 35(9), 540–545.

Feizi, N., Tavakoli, M., Patel, R. V., &Atashzar, S. F. (2021, April 14). Robotics and ai for teleoperation, tele-assessment, and tele-training for surgery in the era of Covid-19: Existing challenges, and future vision. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 610677.

Shah, J., Vyas, A., & Vyas, D.. (2014). The history of robotics in surgical specialties. American Journal of Robotic Surgery, 1(1), 12–20.

Maan, Z. N., Gibbins, N., Al-Jabri, T., & D’Souza, A. R. (2012, January 1). The use of robotics in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: A systematic review. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 33(1), 137–146.

Lin, C. J., & Chen, H. J. (2013, January 1). The investigation of laparoscopic instrument movement control and learning effect. BioMed Research International, 2013, 349825.

Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., & Meyers, W. C. (2004, January). Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 14–21.

Colombo, A. W., Bangemann, T., &Karnouskos, S. (2014, July 27). IMC-AESOP outcomes: Paving the way to collaborative manufacturing systems 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (pp. 255–260). IEEE Publications.

Surgical robots. The official medical robotics news Center for AVRA Surgical Inc. (2012) Retrieved April 24, 2012. http://allaboutroboticsurgery.com/surgicalrobots.html

Morris, B. (2005). Robotic surgery: Applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. MedGenMed: Medscape General Medicine, 7(3), 72.

Childress, V. W. (2007). Robotic surgery. Technology Teacher, 66(5), 9–13.

Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Rubino, F., Smith, M., Vix, M., Simone, M., & Mutter, D. (2002, April 1). Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: Feasibility and potential applications. Annals of Surgery, 235(4), 487–492.

Fracczak, L., Szaniewski, M., &Podsedkowski, L. (2019, June). Share control of surgery robot master manipulator guiding tool along the standard path. International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery, 15(3), e1984.

Spagnolo, A. M., Ottria, G., Amicizia, D., Perdelli, F., & Cristina, M. L. (2013, September). Operating theatre quality and prevention of surgical site infections. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 54(3), 131–137.

Sheetz, K. H., Claflin, J., &Dimick, J. B. (2020, January 3). Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Network Open, 3(1), e191- 911

INTUITIVE. (2019). Investor presentation Q3 2019.

Chihara, R. K., Kim, M. P., & Chan, E. Y. (2020, September). Robotic surgery facilitates complex minimally invasive operations. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 12(9), 4606–4607.

Moawad, G. N., Rahman, S., Martino, M. A., &Klebanoff, J. S. (2020, December). Robotic surgery during the COVID pandemic: Why now and why for the future. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 14(6), 917–920.

Paul, H. A., Bargar, W. L., Mittlestadt, B., Musits, B., Taylor, R. H., Kazanzides, P., Zuhars, J., Williamson, B., & Hanson, W. (1992). Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (285), 57–66.

Bowersox, J. C., Shah, A., Jensen, J., Hill, J., Cordts, P. R., & Green, P. S. (1996, February 1). Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: Initial feasibility studies in swine. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 23(2), 281–287.

Himpens, J., Leman, G., &Cadiere, G. B. (1998, August). Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 12(8), 1091.

Douissard, J., Hagen, M. E., & Morel, P. (2019). The da Vinci Surgical System. In Bariatric Robotic Surgery (pp. 13–27). Springer.

Yip, M., & Das, N. (2018). Robot autonomy for surgery. In The encyclopedia of Medical ROBOTICS, 1 Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics (pp. 281–313).

Mapara, S. S., &Patravale, V. B. (2017, September 10). Medical capsule robots: A renaissance for diagnostics, drug delivery and surgical treatment. Journal of Controlled Release, 261, 337–351.

Li, Y., Hannaford, B., & Rosen, J. (2019, January 1). The Raven open surgical robotic platforms: A review and prospect. Acta PolytechnicaHungarica, 16(8), 9–27.

Batailler, C., Fernandez, A., Swan, J., Servien, E., Haddad, F. S., Catani, F., & Lustig, S. (2021, November). MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29(11), 3585–3598.

Garcia, P., Rosen, J., Kapoor, C., Noakes, M., Elbert, G., Treat, M., Ganous, T., Hanson, M., Manak, J., Hasser, C., Rohler, D., &Satava, R. (2009, June). Trauma Pod: A semi-automated telerobotic surgical system. International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery, 5(2), 136–146.

Gosrisirikul, C., Don Chang, K., Raheem, A. A., &Rha, K. H. (2018, November). New era of robotic surgical systems. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 11(4), 291–299.

Brodie, A., &Vasdev, N. (2018, September). The future of robotic surgery. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 100(Suppl 7)(Suppl. 7), 4–13.

Saeidi, H., Opfermann, J. D., Kam, M., Raghunathan, S., Léonard, S., & Krieger, A. (2018, October 1). A confidence-based shared control strategy for the smart tissue autonomous robot (STAR). In2018. Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE Publications. IEEE Publications, 2018, (1268–1275).

Mitra, R., &Jaramaz, B. NAVIO surgical system—Handheld robotics. InHandbook of robotic and image-guided surgery. (2020, January 1) (pp. 443–457). Elsevier.

Folch, E. E., Pritchett, M., Reisenauer, J., Ost, D. E., Majid, A., Fernandez-Bussy, S., Keyes, C., Parikh, M. S., Diaz-Mendoza, J., Casal, R. F., &Simoff, M. J. (2020, May). A prospective, multi-center evaluation of the clinical utility of the ion endoluminal system-experience using a robotic-assisted bronchoscope system with shape-sensing technology. In A110. Advances in interventional pulmonology (pp. A2719–A2719). American Thoracic Society.

Most read articles by the same author(s)